Insteon std vs extended commands

[Anonymous]

#40380

Folks

I guess i am a little confused and can’t figure something out from the docs.
If i want to send a std insteon command such as this

Light ON 0x02 All 0x11 0x00 ⇒ 0xFF Not Parsed

then this command seems to work great (for insteon lamp 1A:34:AE corresponding to zbpserver device 27749

Node_ClusterCommand227749000[17, 255]

the light goes on which is good

and i get this back as confirmation

Node_ClusterCommand0267f21d7-c9a3-463e-94c5-9b9811fb9c89

followed by this

Node_ClusterCmdRsp06c650000[2b,11,ff]

for lights off its similar

Node_ClusterCommand227749000[19, 0]

Node_ClusterCommand01e8897de-9b50-4c93-bb3a-2de6c2068bd6

Node_ClusterCmdRsp06c650000[2b,13,00]

so std insteon commands seem to work just fine

Question is how do i send an extended insteon command ?

S

[Anonymous]

#44044

It would be something like this:

ZBP_Node
Node_ClusterCommand

0
27749
0
0
1
[2f,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0] //Read Binding

56903

You can try it but unfortunately this won’t work with the zbpserver version you have, but when we update the repo with a new package, will have this fix included. Thanks for your patience.

[Anonymous]

#44045

Dhawal

Thanks for the quick reply, much appreciated. The above looks reasonable, i’ll keep my
eyes open for the new release, am enthused to test it hot off the press as it seems like
a few of my problems will get addressed.

Cheers

S

[Anonymous]

#44046

Dhawal
Gave your suggestion a try anyway, and it looks like it works just fine for me 🙂

I sent this (before xml formatting)

hapc_zbp:: Insteon_ReadBinding(1A:34:AE)
hapc_zbp:: zbp_Message(Node_ClusterCommand,ZBP_Node,[(‘uchar’, 0), (‘ushort’, 27749), (‘uchar’, 0), (‘ushort’, 0), (‘uchar’, 1), (‘QByteArray’, [47, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0])],11,Node_ClusterCmdRsp)

and get this (after xml unformatting, concat of 11 seperate async replies)

hapc_zbp:: Insteon_ReadBinding() completed with reply [0, 27749, 0, 0, 0, 0, ] in 0:00:04.088202 seconds

which seems on first pass to be the correct data, so it looks like its working for me juts fine.

thanks again for your help is much appreciated

S

[Anonymous]

#44047

Oh good, I’m glad that worked.

[Author]

Posts